Comments on 0.97
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Comments on 0.97
Please place any comments regarding v0.97 of OpenXTalk Lite here, and I'll do my best to look at them in the new year. All the best to everyone, and happy testing
https://www.openxtalk.org/forum/viewtop ... 4646#p4646
https://www.openxtalk.org/forum/viewtop ... 4646#p4646
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Cripes . . . that's pretty quick.
Downloading at the mo': comments may take longer than with 0.96 as have my sons here and so on.
on Mac still says: 0.0.9.5
Oh, shags:
- -
Hmm . . .
- -
MacOS 12.7.2
-
Downloading at the mo': comments may take longer than with 0.96 as have my sons here and so on.
on Mac still says: 0.0.9.5
Oh, shags:
- -
Hmm . . .
- -
MacOS 12.7.2
-
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
I'm confused. Just did a test of the dmg, extracted on my old mac:
However, it shouldn't be doing that, so I'll need to try re-codesigning it again and uploading a replacement copy... blast
I'm assuming you see v0.95 on the get-info dialogs? every time I mess around with the plist, it breaks the codesigning, and I probably broke it again when setting it to 0.9.7. So I reverted my plist to an earlier copy (which it also seemingly didn't like ).
I may in future just keep it at 0.0.0.9 and 0.0.1.0 for the mac in the get-info dialogs (plist file), so to stop this kind of thing happening repeatedly. Even if we are at 1.9 it'll say 1.0 in the cmd-i (mac get-info dialog in the finder) because it's a pain to keep remembering to re-apply the codesigning each time.
Anyway, new version incoming.
Just to check I'm not going mad, I also just checked this on my MacBook Air:
Apart from a small "verification" delay... then opened, and opened successfully thereafter.However, it shouldn't be doing that, so I'll need to try re-codesigning it again and uploading a replacement copy... blast
I'm assuming you see v0.95 on the get-info dialogs? every time I mess around with the plist, it breaks the codesigning, and I probably broke it again when setting it to 0.9.7. So I reverted my plist to an earlier copy (which it also seemingly didn't like ).
I may in future just keep it at 0.0.0.9 and 0.0.1.0 for the mac in the get-info dialogs (plist file), so to stop this kind of thing happening repeatedly. Even if we are at 1.9 it'll say 1.0 in the cmd-i (mac get-info dialog in the finder) because it's a pain to keep remembering to re-apply the codesigning each time.
Anyway, new version incoming.
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Have re-codesigned this again.
...It's always the mac version isn't it...
Uploading a new copy to replace the old one.
...It's always the mac version isn't it...
Uploading a new copy to replace the old one.
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Probably will be able to look at it tomorrow afternoon.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Righto. No rush - here's hoping this one works better for you.
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Just popped into my school for a few things, so am downloading the newer 0.97 to see if it will start on MacOS 14 Sonoma . . .
F*ck a Duck:
- - - -
I am not holding my breath for when I try that on MacOS 12 at home later today.
Never mind: as you already know I'm "as kinky as hell", and will keep trying whatever versions you throw at me.
ESPECIALLY as want to check out your changes!
So it would seem: I wonder how those "on the other side" manage 'things'?.It's always the mac version isn't it...
F*ck a Duck:
- - - -
I am not holding my breath for when I try that on MacOS 12 at home later today.
Never mind: as you already know I'm "as kinky as hell", and will keep trying whatever versions you throw at me.
ESPECIALLY as want to check out your changes!
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
haha, in that case, let me tempt you over to the Linux side as your mainstream computer!richmond62 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 8:56 am ...Never mind: as you already know I'm "as kinky as hell", and will keep trying whatever versions you throw at me.
ESPECIALLY as want to check out your changes!
Seriously though, I'm rapidly becoming pi$$3d off with MacOS.
Please try importing the certificate into your 'login items' keychain. If that doesn't work, I'll pass signing of this mac version over to someone else to struggle with.
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
If you look at my last-but-one image, that was what happened when I double-clicked on the certificate.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
I have 2 laptops running Linux; my 'problem' is NOT with Linux, it is with laptops: just do not like them at all.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
I think the word you want is 'deprecated', not 'depreciated'.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
And so, here "we are", on MacOS 12.7.2 and wondering why the flying tiddleypoms the certificate will not be accepted:
- -
Is it "just" my system, or does it fail on other people's Macs?
- -
Is it "just" my system, or does it fail on other people's Macs?
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
AND, as I managed to get 0.96 working perfectly well on both MacOS 12 and MacOS 14: what on earth did you DO that fudged 0.97?
Please give this some careful thought before you start shouting 'deprecated', or even 'depreciated'.
Please give this some careful thought before you start shouting 'deprecated', or even 'depreciated'.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Strongly disapproved of... (not really)richmond62 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:34 pm I think the word you want is 'deprecated', not 'depreciated'.
Reduced in value over time... Yes, this is a good way to describe the state of MacOS.
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
I did everything that I normally do when producing something that might stand a chance of running on CrapOs.richmond62 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 5:43 pm AND, as I managed to get 0.96 working perfectly well on both MacOS 12 and MacOS 14: what on earth did you DO that fudged 0.97?
Please give this some careful thought before you start shouting 'deprecated', or even 'depreciated'.
Never mind.
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
"Over there" and in America generally, re software, they seem to use the word 'deprecated'.
Personally I would choose neither of those words, and rather favour a direct phrase such as "no longer supported", "no longer works",
or "you've had your chips".
Personally I would choose neither of those words, and rather favour a direct phrase such as "no longer supported", "no longer works",
or "you've had your chips".
But I do, desperately.Never mind.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
My current plan is to re-upload the 0.96 mac version (because I know it worked),
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0g093509 ... hqhd8&dl=0
...and then post alongside it the changes needed to make it into 0.97. Mac users can update it themselves, and perhaps they will have more luck.
If you already have 0.96 mac version floating around, just download the changes to make it into 0.97 here:
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/2of5iwre ... pbc5t&dl=0
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
Thank you for that: downloaded and first on my list for tomorrow.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
- tperry2x
- Posts: 1690
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:10 pm
- Location: Britain (Previously known as Great Britain)
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
All help greatly appreciated if someone else wants to pick up the job of maintaining the mac version
- richmond62
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2021 11:03 am
- Location: Bulgaria
- Contact:
Re: Comments on 0.97
I hope I am not being targetted.
Currently working with my chainsaw in the neighbours' garden (them being in their 90s) removing most of a walnut (sad) that was destroyed by a heavy snowfall we had two sennichts syne.
As thee, and anyone else bothering to look, will have jaloused, my 'rmCode' was a model of how to get up the wrong tree without a chainsaw.
So, I am NOT thy Mac-man, although, paradoxically, I do wear a Macintosh hunting kilt, my maternal gowfer being one Richmond McIntosh from the Isle of Bute.
HOWEVER, I shall play swap-arounds tonight, and should that suffice, it might be a grand idea to keep making Mac versions by sequential twiddling with 0.96, rather than going for full builds, or whatever you have been doing to produce non-functional Mac builds, and get you in a foul temper.
Right, I have had my mid-yoken, so I am off to the walnut tree again, first with the chainsaw and then with the 'Nunga muncher' to turn the thinner branches into mulch.
Currently working with my chainsaw in the neighbours' garden (them being in their 90s) removing most of a walnut (sad) that was destroyed by a heavy snowfall we had two sennichts syne.
As thee, and anyone else bothering to look, will have jaloused, my 'rmCode' was a model of how to get up the wrong tree without a chainsaw.
So, I am NOT thy Mac-man, although, paradoxically, I do wear a Macintosh hunting kilt, my maternal gowfer being one Richmond McIntosh from the Isle of Bute.
HOWEVER, I shall play swap-arounds tonight, and should that suffice, it might be a grand idea to keep making Mac versions by sequential twiddling with 0.96, rather than going for full builds, or whatever you have been doing to produce non-functional Mac builds, and get you in a foul temper.
Right, I have had my mid-yoken, so I am off to the walnut tree again, first with the chainsaw and then with the 'Nunga muncher' to turn the thinner branches into mulch.
https://richmondmathewson.owlstown.net/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest